Dianne Feinstein Wants To Know Why You Need An AR-15

California gun-banner Dianne Feinstein sent out a tweet asking people why they need an AR-15. In reality, she doesn’t want an answer to that question. As a liberal, schooled in the ways of deception, what she is really saying is you don’t need an AR-15 or any any other scary-looking semi-automatic rifle and that she intends to make sure you can’t have them.

Here’s what the anti-liberty democrat tweeted out:

Today we have 15 million assault weapons in the U.S. These are guns modeled after military weapons and then sold to civilians. For what? You can’t use it for hunting. You don’t need it for defense. What do you really need it for?

Today we have 15 million assault weapons in the U.S. These are guns modeled after military weapons and then sold to civilians. For what? You can’t use it for hunting. You don’t need it for defense. What do you really need it for?

According to DiFi none of us need an AR-15 because it is impossible to hunt with them or even fend off violent attackers.

Let’s go to the Constitution for some clarity. The 2nd Amendment reads: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

That’s weird. I don’t see the words “need” “hunting” or “defense” anywhere in that Amendment. It’s almost like our Founding Fathers didn’t want to tie gun ownership to hunting or a specific need defined by the government. I do see the words “right” “people” “bear arms” and “shall not be infringed” however, so I feel like what’s in the 2nd Amendment is more important than words that do not appear, but are imposed by a leftist opponent of basic freedom.

I know this is going to blow some minds, but Feinstein is also wrong about AR-15’s being useless for hunting and defense. It makes a great varmint rifle for ranchers, and hog hunters love the platform. As far as defense goes, it’s a f*cking firearm. If a potential victim needs to engage an armed bad guy or multiple bad guys, it does the trick. Plus, check this out: a guy in Illinois successful used one to stop a murder. Narrative busted.

A better question would be: why do democrats insist upon banning something that isn’t even remotely a problem? AR-15s are used in so few crimes every year that it is statistically insignificant. I’m not saying they should go after handguns, but those weapons are used in the vast majority of crimes, murders, and yes even mass shootings.

I don’t want Feinstein to go away empty handed here, so I will tell her why I need an AR-15. The first thing is, none of my AR-15 magazines fit in any of my other guns so clearly I need one. Also, just in case her fascist political party ever returns to power and decides my rights no longer matter, I need an AR-15 to put .233-sized holes in the asses of the shock troops she sends to deprive me of my liberty, which is why our Founding Fathers wrote the 2nd Amendment in the first place.

Follow Brian Anderson on Twitter